Scratch Test
The Mohs hardness kit presents a range of materials of varying hardness. The idea is that if two materials interact, the one that is harder will scratch the one that is less hard. Starting with hardness level 2, a material called gypsum, every single smartphone was able to completely resist this. Moving onto level 3, a material called calcite, some damage was observed on the Galaxy S1. This was hard enough to cause light surface scratches, and this trend continued for all the plastic phones up to the Galaxy S5. However, on the S6 and beyond, no damage was observed. For a point of reference, level 3 is also hard enough to scratch the infamous Nokia 3310.
Durability Scale
To gauge the hardness of each device, a durability scale was designed. Each device was given a durability rating that would carry on through all the tests.
Bend Test
The bend test was conducted to assess the flexibility of each device. The Galaxy S1 was the most flexible, with the S5 and S6 being slightly less flexible. However, the S7 and S8 were much more rigid, and the S9 and S10 were the most rigid of all.
Drop Test
The drop test was conducted to assess the impact resistance of each device. The Galaxy S1 was the least resistant, with the S5 and S6 being slightly more resistant. However, the S7 and S8 were much more resistant, and the S9 and S10 were the most resistant of all.
Are Smartphones Getting Weaker?
With the ever-evolving technology of smartphones, it is no surprise that the question of whether they are getting weaker has been raised. To answer this question, we must look at the durability of the devices. A test was conducted to compare the final scores of different phones to see if they are getting weaker.
Testing Materials
The test used four different materials to measure the durability of the phones. The first material used was fluorite, which is hard enough to gouge at the back of plastic-based phones. The second material was apatite, which saw right through all the plastic phones with ease. The third material was author clays, which showed signs of damage on the glass phones. And the fourth material was a hardness level that deeply damaged the phones.
Results
The results of the test showed that the plastic-based phones were deeply damaged by the fourth material, and thus received four durability points. The glass phones were only lightly damaged by the sixth material, and the Samsung S9 and S10 were not scratched at all. This indicates that the newer phones are more durable than their predecessors.
Scratch Resistance
The scratch resistance of smartphones has been a topic of debate for many years. While some argue that the technology has improved, others believe that it has not kept up with the advancements in other areas of the device. To determine whether or not smartphones are getting weaker, it is important to understand the different levels of scratch resistance.
Scratch Levels
The Mohs scale of mineral hardness is used to measure scratch resistance. Level one is talc, which is a soft mineral that can be easily scratched. Level two is gypsum, which is slightly harder than talc and can leave marks on the surface of the device. Level three is calcite, which is harder than gypsum and can leave deeper marks. Level four is fluorite, which is harder than calcite and can leave deeper marks. Level five is apatite, which is harder than fluorite and can leave deep gouges. Level six is orthoclase, which is harder than apatite and can leave deep gouges.
Testing Scratch Resistance
To test the scratch resistance of smartphones, a device is placed on a scratch test machine and a diamond-tipped stylus is used to scratch the surface of the device. The stylus is moved across the surface of the device in a controlled manner and the depth of the scratches is measured. The deeper the scratches, the weaker the device is considered to be.
Results
The results of the scratch test show that smartphones are not getting weaker. In fact, the scratch resistance of devices has improved significantly over the years. Glass devices, such as the Samsung Galaxy S10, are able to withstand scratches up to level eight on the Mohs scale. This is due to the use of Gorilla Glass, which is a special type of glass that is designed to be more scratch resistant than regular glass.
The Strength of Smartphones
Smartphones have come a long way in terms of strength and durability. With the introduction of Corning Gorilla Glass, the strength of smartphones has been greatly increased. This glass is designed to be scratch and impact resistant, making it ideal for use on smartphones. However, even with the strength of Corning Gorilla Glass, smartphones are still susceptible to damage.
Testing the Strength of Smartphones
To test the strength of smartphones, a hardness scale is used. This scale ranges from level 1 to level 8, with level 1 being the weakest and level 8 being the strongest. To test the strength of a smartphone, a dust removal sticker is used to remove any dust or debris from the screen. Then, a screen protector is applied and the hardness scale is tested.
Results of the Test
The results of the test show that all smartphones are able to resist damage up to level 6 on the hardness scale. This means that even the weakest smartphones are able to resist light scratches and gouges. However, at level 7 and 8, the results start to vary. At level 7, some smartphones are able to resist deeper cuts, while others are not. At level 8, all smartphones are susceptible to light scratches and marks.
Scratch Resistance Test
The scratch resistance test was conducted on a variety of smartphones to determine their durability. The test involved using a 9-point scale, with 9 being the highest level of scratch resistance. All the plastic phones tested were found to be relatively resistant to scratches, however, some of the glass devices had shattered due to the pressure applied during the test. Notably, the Samsung S line of phones fared better than the other devices, as they were made with thicker glass.
Hammer Test
The hammer test was conducted on the six phones that were placed on the table. The phones were subjected to a light hit followed by a much heavier hit. The results showed that the Samsung S1 was the most resilient to the hammer test, leaving only a tiny scratch. The other phones tested also showed good resistance to the hammer test.
Drop Test
The drop test was conducted to assess the phones’ ability to withstand impacts. The phones were dropped from a height of 1 meter onto a hard surface. The Samsung S1 was the most resilient to the drop test, with no visible damage. The other phones tested also showed good resistance to the drop test, with only minor scratches and dents.
Water Resistance Test
The water resistance test was conducted to assess the phones’ ability to withstand water. The phones were submerged in water for a period of 30 minutes. The Samsung S1 was the most resilient to the water resistance test, with no visible damage. The other phones tested also showed good resistance to the water resistance test, with only minor water damage.
Durability Test
A durability test was conducted to assess the strength of two smartphones. The first phone, the Samsung S2, was subjected to a series of tests including a reverse hammer hit. Despite the intensity of the test, it only left a barely visible mark and the phone remained completely usable. The second phone, the Samsung S3, was also tested with a reverse hammer hit. The results showed that the S2, in an effort to make the phone much slimmer, had a much lower level of resistance than the S3.
Bending Test
The S2 phone was subjected to a bending test. This caused significant damage to the phone and rendered it almost useless. The back panel remained unharmed, but the side resistance was not as strong as the S3. The S3 phone also underwent a bending test, but it did not cause any significant damage and the phone remained usable.
Hammer Test
The S2 phone was subjected to a hammer test. A light hammer did not cause any more damage than had already been done, but a heavy hammer left a real mark. The S3 phone also underwent a hammer test. It did not leave any particular feature unusable and the display did not look too damaged. The side resistance in particular on this phone was very good.
Reverse Hammer Test
The S2 phone was subjected to a reverse hammer test. This test left the phone almost completely useless. The S3 phone also underwent a reverse hammer test. It did not crack the screen, but it did leave a permanent pink line through it and the phone was stuck in a permanent boot loop.
The results of these tests suggest that smartphones are indeed getting weaker. The S2 phone, which was designed to be slim, was not able to withstand the tests as well as the S3 phone. Even the S3 phone was not able to withstand the reverse hammer test, and was rendered useless. This indicates that modern smartphones are not as durable as they once were, and are more susceptible to damage.
Galaxy S4
The Galaxy S4 was not off to a good start. The Ben test revealed considerable damage, with whirring and cracking, and a large portion of the screen being completely destroyed. Despite this, the phone did not suffer further damage from the other tests. The reverse Hammer test, however, caused more damage than expected. Even though the trim was unharmed, the phone was almost broken after one knock on the side. The screen, which was still partially functioning before the test, no longer worked afterwards.
Galaxy S5
The Galaxy S5 fared better in the Ben test, with no visible damage. However, the Hammer test revealed a different story. The cracking became much more apparent, indicating internal damage.
Galaxy S6
The Galaxy S6 was the first all-glass smartphone tested. Despite being scratched and subjected to pressure, it held up reasonably well in the Ben test. A slight cracking sound was heard, but no notable damage was observed. Unfortunately, the subsequent tests were not as successful, with even a light tap from the Hammer test causing significant damage.
The results of these tests suggest that smartphones are becoming increasingly fragile. The Galaxy S4 was the most damaged, with the Ben test alone causing considerable destruction. The Galaxy S5 was more resilient, but the Hammer test revealed internal damage. The Galaxy S6 was the most durable, but even a light tap from the Hammer test caused significant damage. This indicates that smartphones are becoming increasingly vulnerable, and users should take extra care when handling them.
Galaxy S1
The Samsung Galaxy S1 was subjected to a massive crack, which spread throughout the entire front of the phone. The metal side trim put up some resistance, but the already cracked and fragile glass on either side caused further damage. Despite this, the phone remained relatively unscathed, with only scratches from the first test.
Galaxy S2
The Samsung Galaxy S2 was a complete train wreck from the front, but the back remained relatively intact. The phone was rendered unusable, but the visible damage was much less than expected.
Galaxy S3
The Samsung Galaxy S3 was a noticeable improvement over the S2, with less visible damage. The phone was still unusable, but the physical damage was much less.
Galaxy S4
The Samsung Galaxy S4 was marketed as a life companion, but it was quickly rendered unusable after the tests. The phone was left with only a few visible marks, but the internal damage was severe.
Galaxy S5
The Samsung Galaxy S5 fared much better than its predecessors, with no visible damage. However, the internal damage was severe, as the display had no output at all.
Galaxy S6
The Samsung Galaxy S6 was the most fragile of all the phones tested, with only 30 points of resistance. The phone was completely totaled after the reverse hammer hit, making all the other phones look like absolute tanks in comparison.
Nokia 3310
The Nokia 3310 was the special guest of the tests, as it is the device that mobile phone durability is compared to. Despite its age, the phone held up remarkably well, with only a few scratches and no visible damage.
The results of the tests show that smartphones are getting weaker, with each new model being more fragile than the last. The Samsung Galaxy S1 was the most resilient, withstanding a massive crack and only sustaining scratches. The Galaxy S2 and S3 were rendered unusable, but the visible damage was much less than expected. The Galaxy S4 was left with only a few visible marks, but the internal damage was severe. The Galaxy S5 had no visible damage, but the internal damage was severe. , the Galaxy S6 was completely totaled after the reverse hammer hit, making all the other phones look like absolute tanks in comparison. The Nokia 3310, despite its age, held up remarkably well, with only a few scratches and no visible damage.
Galaxy S7 Durability Test
The Galaxy S7 was put through a series of durability tests to assess its strength and resilience. The first test involved bending the phone, which resulted in a cracking sound. Despite this, the phone passed the hammer test with only a few scratches. However, the reverse hammer test proved more challenging and left the device with a cracked screen. The standard variant of the phone also raised worries about its durability when it was released.
Galaxy S8 Durability Test
The Galaxy S8 was also tested for its durability. It was found to be vulnerable to breaking, with every test leaving a mark on the device. The final test left a significant crater on the screen, which rendered it unresponsive. The back of the phone was also left in a state of disrepair, with small pieces of glass scattered across the table.
Galaxy S9 Durability Test
The Galaxy S9 was the last phone to be tested. It was hoped that the device would fare better than its predecessors, however, it was found to be just as vulnerable. The phone was subjected to the same tests as the S7 and S8, with similar results. The device was left with scratches, cracks, and craters on its screen and back.
Are Smartphones Getting Weaker?
The durability tests conducted on the Galaxy S7, S8, and S9 suggest that smartphones are becoming increasingly weaker and more vulnerable to damage. Despite improvements in design and technology, the devices still suffer from the same issues when exposed to extreme conditions. This raises questions about the long-term reliability of smartphones and whether manufacturers are doing enough to ensure their products are durable and resilient.
Thicker Glass
The use of thicker glass in the Galaxy S10 has proven to be effective in providing added durability. The foam used in the device was found to be “mega durable” and could withstand a hammer hit with minimal damage. The side trim was also not affected by the impact, although the glass on the back was already weak and resulted in a crack.
Samsung’s Improvement
The durability of the S10 was expected to be better than the S9, and it appears that Samsung is on the right track in terms of improving their products. The first hammer test did not cause any damage, while the second one left a slight dent in the display. The curved glass on the back of the phone was also more resistant to cracking.
Nokia Phone
The Nokia phone was put to the test and it was found to be even more durable than the S10. The reverse hammer hit caused almost no damage to the front of the phone, while the back experienced some cracking. This shows that Nokia is still producing phones that are highly resistant to damage.
Glass Fusion Guard
The Samsung S10 with the Glass Fusion Guard installed proved to be a formidable device when it came to the Ben Test and Hammer Test. The Hammer Test left a few marks, but the Glass Fusion Guard was designed with impact in mind, and when removed, it became clear that the screen was undamaged.
Nokia 3310
The Nokia 3310, dubbed the Titan of the mobile phone market, was put to the test. The first hammer hit alone was enough to destroy the screen, and hitting the phone from the side left a mark, but no structural damage. It was clear that the Nokia 3310 had a vulnerability in its display, but when it came to the general body of the phone, it was as indestructible as advertised.
Durability of Smartphones
The durability of smartphones has been a topic of debate for a while now. While the Nokia 3310 was renowned for its sturdiness, the Galaxy S7 was considered to be average in terms of durability. The S8 was completely destroyed from both the front and the back, and the S9 was where Samsung started to make a shift towards thicker glass. This was seen to make a bigger difference than any level of Gorilla Glass. The trend has been carried forward to the S10, and this has been a positive development.
Design vs Durability
The focus of smartphone manufacturers has shifted from durability to design and form factor. This has been a result of the advancement of technology, which has enabled the production of slim devices that are also incredibly durable. This has been a welcome change, as it has allowed users to have the best of both worlds.
The Future of Smartphone Durability
The future of smartphone durability looks bright, as manufacturers are now able to produce slim devices that are also incredibly durable. This is a positive development, as it allows users to have the best of both worlds. It will be interesting to see how manufacturers continue to innovate in this area in the coming years.
Austgen and Im here to answer the question are smartphones getting weaker?
The Evolution of Smartphones
Smartphones have come a long way since their inception in the early 2000s. From bulky, brick-like devices to sleek, slim models, smartphones have evolved to become an integral part of our lives. But with the rapid advancement of technology, are smartphones getting weaker?
The Pros and Cons of Smartphone Technology
On the one hand, smartphones have become faster and more powerful than ever before. The latest models are equipped with powerful processors, high-resolution screens, and advanced cameras. This has enabled users to do more with their devices, such as streaming videos, playing games, and editing photos.
On the other hand, smartphones are becoming increasingly fragile. As technology advances, manufacturers are cramming more components into smaller and thinner devices. This makes them more susceptible to damage from drops and other impacts. Additionally, the batteries in many smartphones are not as durable as they used to be, leading to shorter battery life.
The Future of Smartphones
Despite the potential for weaker smartphones, manufacturers are continuing to push the boundaries of technology. Smartphones are becoming faster, more powerful, and more efficient than ever before. This means that users can do more with their devices, such as accessing high-speed internet, playing graphics-intensive games, and editing videos.
At the same time, manufacturers are also developing new technologies to make smartphones more durable. For example, some manufacturers are using tougher materials such as Gorilla Glass and Kevlar to make their devices more resistant to damage. Additionally, some manufacturers are using advanced battery technologies to extend battery life.
The results of the scratch, bend, and drop tests indicate that newer flagship smartphones are indeed stronger than their predecessors. The S6 and beyond are able to resist scratches from materials of level 3 hardness, are more rigid, and are more impact resistant. Therefore, it can be concluded that newer flagship smartphones are indeed stronger than their predecessors.
Overall, it appears that smartphones are getting stronger, not weaker. The newer phones are more resistant to damage than their predecessors, indicating that technology is advancing and making phones more durable.
Overall, it appears that smartphones are not getting weaker. The use of Gorilla Glass and other scratch-resistant materials has allowed devices to withstand scratches up to level eight on the Mohs scale. This means that devices are able to withstand more wear and tear than ever before.
Overall, it is clear that smartphones are getting stronger and more durable. However, they are still susceptible to damage at higher levels of the hardness scale. Therefore, it is important to take precautions when using a smartphone to ensure that it remains in good condition.
Overall, the results of the tests conducted on the various smartphones showed that the Samsung S1 was the most resilient to the various tests. The other phones tested also showed good resistance to the tests, with only minor damage. This suggests that smartphones are not necessarily getting weaker, but rather that manufacturers are making them more durable.
It is evident that modern smartphones are more durable than their predecessors, with the Samsung S10 with the Glass Fusion Guard proving to be a resilient device. However, the Nokia 3310 still stands as a testament to the fragility of some devices, with its display proving to be its Achilles heel.
It is clear that smartphones are continuing to evolve. While they may be getting weaker in some respects, they are also becoming more powerful and durable. As technology advances, manufacturers are developing new technologies to make smartphones faster, more powerful, and more durable.