Rugged Phones
Rugged phones are becoming increasingly popular due to their durability and resistance to damage. Many of these phones are marketed as indestructible, and they often come with a hefty price tag. The Ulefone Arma 10 and the Blackvue BL6000 Pro are two of the best rugged phones on the market, both retailing at around $700.
Cheap Quality
Despite the hefty price tag, the quality of the Ulefone Arma 10 and the Blackvue BL6000 Pro is far from impressive. The charging cable and adapter feel cheap and flimsy, and the 18-watt charging is far from ideal. Furthermore, the actual specs of the phone are quite underwhelming, and the marketing is often misleading.
Durability
The main selling point of rugged phones is their durability, and this is where the Ulefone Arma 10 and the Blackvue BL6000 Pro really shine. Both phones are designed to withstand harsh conditions, and they come with a range of protective features such as reinforced corners and dust-proof seals. However, it is important to note that these phones are not completely indestructible, and they may still be susceptible to damage if not used properly.
64 Megapixel Main Camera
The 64 megapixel main camera on this Smartphone may seem like an attractive feature, but it is not equipped with optical image stabilization, making it difficult to take clear shots. Furthermore, the other sensors on the device are relatively weak, with only 8, 5, and 2 megapixel resolutions.
Display
The display on this Smartphone is also subpar, with thick bezels that make it look outdated and a 60 hertz 1080p LCD panel that feels like it belongs in 2013. This is in stark contrast to other Smartphones in the same price range, such as the Xiaomi 11, which offers a much better display.
Battery
The battery on this Smartphone is a high capacity one, but it is the only redeeming feature on the device. Other than that, it is poorly equipped compared to other Smartphones in the same price range.
5G Capabilities
This Smartphone claims to be the world’s first 5G rugged phone, but it is unclear how this is possible. It is highly unlikely that this device was released at the exact same minute as another phone, so it is unlikely that they could be joint first.
Its huge.
Materials
The Blackvue Blackviewphone is marketed as a premium device, with a price tag to match. However, upon closer inspection, it appears that the materials used are not necessarily of a higher quality than those used in cheaper devices. The Blackvue Blackviewphone features glass, aluminium and rubber, while the cheaper Poco X3 features glass, aluminium and plastic. The glass used on the Blackviewphone is Gorilla Glass 3, which is the same as the glass used on the Poco X3. The Blackviewphone does have a slightly better build quality, with metal instead of rubber, but it is still not significantly better than the cheaper option.
Price
The Blackvue Blackviewphone is nearly three times as expensive as the Poco X3. This is a significant difference in price, and it is difficult to justify such a high cost for a device that does not feature significantly better materials. It is possible that the higher price is due to the larger size of the Blackviewphone, as it weighs 328 grams, making it almost twice as thick as the Poco X3.
Durability
The Blackvue Blackviewphone is marketed as being durable, but it is difficult to assess how durable it really is. The materials used are not necessarily of a higher quality than those used in cheaper devices, and the device is not waterproof or dustproof. Additionally, the Blackviewphone is not compatible with any rugged cases, meaning that it is not possible to protect the device from drops or other impacts.
The Poco X3 and OnePlus Nord
The Poco X3 and OnePlus Nord are two affordable smartphones that boast of an IP68 and IP69K rating, making them resistant to water and high-pressure jets. To test their durability, they were subjected to a series of six tests, starting with water.
Test 1: Water
The phones were submerged in a bowl of water for two minutes. After the test, both phones were found to be functioning normally.
Test 2: High-Pressure Jet
The phones were then subjected to a two-minute high-pressure jet of water at 50 degrees Celsius. After the test, both phones were still working.
Test 3: Drop Test
The phones were then dropped from a height of one meter. Both phones survived the drop test without any damage.
Test 4: Heat Test
The phones were then subjected to a heat test, where they were placed in an oven at a temperature of 80 degrees Celsius for two minutes. Both phones survived the heat test without any damage.
Test 5: Cold Test
The phones were then subjected to a cold test, where they were placed in a freezer at a temperature of -20 degrees Celsius for two minutes. Both phones survived the cold test without any damage.
Test 6: Scratch Test
The final test was a scratch test, where the phones were scratched with a metal object. Both phones survived the scratch test without any damage.
Rugged Phones
Rugged phones are designed to withstand the wear and tear of everyday use, and are often marketed as being more durable than other smartphones. The two rugged phones tested here are the Black View and the Uniform. Both phones have minor level scuffs across the whole body, with deeper level gouges on the Black View. The Uniform has some damage around the metal camera ring and the fingerprint scanner, but overall its integrity is better.
Testing Resistance to Damage
To test the resistance of these phones to damage from coins and keys, a cheese grater was used. The Black View was found to have more significant damage than the Uniform, but the Poco X3 had no more significant damage than the rugged phones. This suggests that using a case can protect the phone from damage, and that the phone itself is unmarked.
Testing Front Glass
To test the front glass, a set of mouse feet were used. The mouse feet were found to be effective in testing the front glass, as they were able to scratch the glass without leaving any permanent damage. The results suggest that the front glass of these phones is resistant to scratches and other damage.
Durability Test
To assess the durability of the smartphones, a hardness pick test was conducted. The test began with a level 6 pick, which tested the screens’ resistance to scratches and other minor damages. All the phones were able to withstand the level 6 pick, and even the level 7 pick. However, the level 8 pick caused visible damage to the screens, with the most damage seen on the rugged phones.
Hammer Test
To further test the durability of the smartphones, a 40 centimeter marker was dropped on them from a height of 40 centimeters. The results were quite surprising, with the two cheaper phones with cheaper cases sustaining the least amount of damage. The Poco X3 had some sun screen cracking, but the screen was still usable. The Oneplus Nord, on the other hand, looked like nothing had happened to it. This could be attributed to the fact that the cases of the cheaper phones had a ridge on them, which the rugged phones did not.
The Drawbacks of Rugged Smartphones
Rugged smartphones have become increasingly popular in recent years, as they are designed to withstand extreme conditions and environments. However, these devices come with a number of drawbacks that should be taken into consideration before making a purchase.
Cracked Screens
One of the main drawbacks of rugged smartphones is that the screens are often prone to cracking. This is due to the fact that the screens are designed to be more durable than regular smartphone screens, but this also makes them more susceptible to cracking. As such, it is important to consider the risk of cracked screens when purchasing a rugged smartphone.
Poor Value for Money
Another issue with rugged smartphones is that they often offer poor value for money. Many of these devices are priced significantly higher than regular smartphones, yet they often lack features such as high-quality cameras and displays. As such, it is important to consider whether the extra cost is worth it for the features offered.
Not Suitable for Everyday Use
It is important to note that rugged smartphones are not suitable for everyday use. These devices are designed for extreme conditions and environments, and as such, they are not suitable for regular use. Therefore, it is important to consider whether a rugged smartphone is the right choice for your needs.
It is important to consider the drawbacks of rugged smartphones before making a purchase. These devices are often more expensive than regular smartphones, yet they lack features such as high-quality cameras and displays. Furthermore, they are not suitable for everyday use and the screens are prone to cracking. Therefore, it is important to weigh up the pros and cons before deciding whether a rugged smartphone is the right choice for you.
Ulefone Music
The Ulefone Music was the first phone to be tested and the results were not encouraging. Upon being dropped from a height, the phone flew out of its case and into three separate pieces. The damage was severe and it was clear that the phone was not designed to withstand such an impact.
OnePlus Nord
The OnePlus Nord was the most durable phone tested and yet it too failed to survive the drop test. The phone shattered into multiple pieces and the battery seemed to have exploded. This was a clear indication that the phone was not suitable for rugged use.
Poco
The Poco fared no better than the other two phones. The screen was completely destroyed and the plastic on the back remained intact. The battery also seemed to have disappeared, making it clear that the phone was not designed to withstand such an impact.
Overall, it is clear that none of these phones are suitable for rugged use. They may look sturdy and appear to be able to withstand a drop, but in reality they are not designed for such use. Therefore, it is advisable not to purchase any of these phones if you are looking for a device that can withstand rugged use.
Ulefone and Black View Rugged Phones
The Ulefone and Black View rugged phones are designed to withstand the rigors of everyday life, including accidental knocks and drops. However, upon closer inspection, it is clear that the circuitry of the Ulefone has been damaged, and the Black View still has a slight backlight for its LCD screen, although it is not recommended for use in its current state.
Brilliant: A Way to Make Yourself Better
Brilliant is an online platform that offers courses in a variety of topics, from storytelling to coding, with the aim of helping users become smarter, faster and more knowledgeable. The courses are designed to be engaging and interactive, with puzzles, questions and other activities that make learning enjoyable. Furthermore, the courses are structured in such a way that users can learn without realizing they are doing so, making the process more natural and enjoyable.
Why You Should Avoid Buying These Smartphones
Given the damage to the Ulefone and the questionable state of the Black View, it is clear that these smartphones should be avoided. The Ulefone’s circuitry is damaged, and the Black View is not recommended for use in its current state. Furthermore, there are better options available, such as the online courses offered by Brilliant, which can help users become smarter, faster and more knowledgeable.
Overview of the Smartphone
The smartphone in question boasts a range of features that may seem appealing to some consumers. It has a large display, a powerful processor, and a long-lasting battery. Additionally, it has a sleek design and is available in a variety of colors.
Reasons to Avoid the Smartphone
Despite its attractive features, there are several reasons why consumers should avoid purchasing this particular smartphone. Firstly, the cost of the device is exorbitant, making it unaffordable for many. Secondly, the device has been known to suffer from frequent software glitches, which can be extremely frustrating for users. Thirdly, the device is not compatible with certain apps and services, which may be a deal-breaker for some. , the device has been known to overheat, causing potential damage to the phone and user.
Alternatives to Consider
For those looking for a quality smartphone, there are several alternatives to consider. Many of these devices offer similar features and performance, but at a more affordable price point. Additionally, they are often more reliable and compatible with a wider range of apps and services. Some of the most popular alternatives include the iPhone 11, Samsung Galaxy S20, and Google Pixel 4.
The Ulefone Arma 10 and the Blackvue BL6000 Pro are two of the best rugged phones on the market, and they offer impressive levels of durability and protection. However, it is important to note that these phones are not completely indestructible, and they may still be susceptible to damage if not used properly. Furthermore, the quality of the phone is far from impressive, and the actual specs are quite underwhelming. As such, it may be best to look elsewhere for a more reliable and durable phone.
The Blackvue Blackviewphone is not necessarily a bad device, but it is difficult to justify the high price tag when compared to cheaper devices. The materials used are not necessarily of a higher quality than those used in cheaper devices, and the device is not waterproof or dustproof. Additionally, the Blackviewphone is not compatible with any rugged cases, meaning that it is not possible to protect the device from drops or other impacts. For these reasons, it is recommended that consumers do not purchase the Blackvue Blackviewphone.
The Poco X3 and OnePlus Nord are two rugged smartphones that are resistant to water, high-pressure jets, drops, heat, cold, and scratches. However, despite their durability, they are not without their flaws. The battery life is not great, and the cameras are not the best. Therefore, if you are looking for a smartphone that is durable and reliable, these two may not be the best option.
Overall, the phones tested here are resistant to damage from coins, keys, and scratches. However, it is important to note that this resistance is only achieved when the phone is used with a case. Without a case, the phone is more vulnerable to damage. Therefore, it is recommended that users of these phones invest in a good quality case to protect their device.
The results of the tests conducted on the smartphones showed that the cheaper phones with cheaper cases were able to withstand more damage than the rugged phones. This could be attributed to the ridge on the cases of the cheaper phones, which provided additional protection. Therefore, it can be concluded that buying a cheaper phone with a cheaper case is a better option than buying a rugged phone.
It is clear that the smartphone in question is not the best option for consumers. Its high cost, frequent software glitches, incompatibility with certain apps and services, and tendency to overheat make it a less than ideal choice. Consumers should instead consider other options that offer similar features and performance at a more affordable price point.
