Exynos vs Snapdragon: Performance
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is available in two versions, one powered by an Exynos chip and the other by a Qualcomm Snapdragon chip. On the surface, the difference between the two may not be immediately apparent, but a closer look reveals a significant disparity in performance. Benchmark tests such as Antutu show that the Snapdragon version is far ahead in terms of speed and power, with a score of 550,000 compared to 500,000 for the Exynos version. This is a 10% jump, almost equivalent to a half-generation leap in performance.
Thermal Throttling
The disparity between the two chips is further highlighted when it comes to thermal throttling. After running Antutu three times continuously, the Snapdragon chip reached a temperature of 40 degrees Celsius, while the Exynos chip was at 59 degrees. After the third run, the Exynos chip managed to bring the temperature down to 53 degrees, but the final run pushed it up to 66 degrees. This is an indication of thermal throttling, which can significantly reduce the performance of the chip.
Battery Life
The Snapdragon chip also has an advantage when it comes to battery life. Tests have shown that the Snapdragon version can last up to 10 hours on a single charge, while the Exynos version can only last up to 8 hours. This is a significant difference, especially for those who use their phones for long periods of time.
Exynos vs Snapdragon
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is available in two different versions, one with the Exynos 990 processor and the other with the Snapdragon 865 processor. While both processors are powerful, they differ in performance and efficiency. The Exynos 990 is Samsung’s own processor, while the Snapdragon 865 is Qualcomm’s flagship processor.
Benchmark Performance
Benchmark tests have shown that the Snapdragon 865 outperforms the Exynos 990 in terms of raw performance. In the Geekbench 5 benchmark, the Snapdragon 865 scored an average of 550,000 points, while the Exynos 990 scored an average of 500,000 points. The Snapdragon 865 also outperformed the Exynos 990 in the 3DMark benchmark, scoring 22,000 points compared to the Exynos 990’s 15,000 points.
Thermal Throttling
The Exynos 990 has a major disadvantage over the Snapdragon 865, however, which is thermal throttling. The Exynos 990 starts to throttle its performance when it gets hot, which happens quickly. As a result, the Exynos 990’s performance falls from 500,000 points to around 450,000 points. The Snapdragon 865, on the other hand, only falls from 550,000 points to around 500,000 points. This means that the Exynos 990 is significantly slower than the Snapdragon 865 when it comes to sustained performance.
Real-World Performance
In real-world usage, the difference between the Exynos 990 and the Snapdragon 865 is not as noticeable. Flicking through homescreens, loading applications, and other tasks are performed at similar speeds on both processors. The difference is more noticeable in prolonged gaming sessions and in tasks that require a lot of CPU power, such as emulation. In these cases, the Exynos 990 starts to show its limitations, while the Snapdragon 865 remains unaffected.
Exynos vs Snapdragon
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is equipped with two different processors: the Exynos 990 and the Snapdragon 865. Both processors are powerful, but there are some differences between them that can affect the user experience.
Performance
The Exynos 990 is a powerful processor, but it can struggle with resource-intensive tasks. This can be seen in the game Bright Mobile, where the Exynos processor can cause the framerate to drop to 15 frames per second. In comparison, the Snapdragon 865 is able to maintain a consistent 60 frames per second.
Camera UI
The Snapdragon 865 also offers a smoother and faster camera UI. Shifting between lenses is noticeably faster on the Snapdragon processor, making it easier to take quick photos.
Photo Quality
The Snapdragon 865 also offers superior photo quality. This is due to the fact that the Snapdragon processor contains not only the CPU, but also the graphics, modem, and image signal processors. This allows it to produce better photos with greater dynamic range and more detail than the Exynos processor.
Exynos vs Snapdragon: A Comparison
When it comes to the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, there is a clear distinction between the Exynos and Snapdragon versions. While the differences may not be immediately apparent, there are some key differences that can be observed when taking a closer look.
Camera Performance
When it comes to camera performance, the Snapdragon version appears to have an edge over the Exynos. This is particularly evident when cropping into photos, as the Snapdragon is able to bring out a greater level of detail. Textures that are almost invisible on the Exynos version are sharp and clear on the Snapdragon. While this difference may be subtle, it is a consistent trend.
Power Efficiency
In terms of power efficiency, the two chipsets are both cutting-edge in terms of their fabrication process. However, when tested side-by-side, the Snapdragon version was found to have more battery life remaining at the end of the day. To test this, both phones were put through a series of activities such as downloading applications, playing games, watching YouTube, and running benchmarks. After three hours of activity, the Exynos version had 59% battery remaining, while the Snapdragon still had 71%. This suggests that the Snapdragon version has an estimated screen-on time of nine hours, while the Exynos version has an estimated screen-on time of seven hours.
Exynos vs Snapdragon: A Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is one of the most powerful smartphones on the market, but the debate between Exynos and Snapdragon chipsets has been ongoing for years. The Exynos chipset is made by Samsung and is used in some of their phones, while the Snapdragon chipset is made by Qualcomm and is used in many other phones. So which one is better?
Benchmark Tests
Benchmark tests have been conducted to compare the performance of the Exynos and Snapdragon chipsets. The results of these tests show that the Snapdragon chipset outperforms the Exynos chipset in terms of speed and power. For example, in a test conducted on the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Snapdragon chipset was able to run games at 1080p at 60 Hertz, while the Exynos chipset was not able to do so.
Why Does Samsung Use Exynos?
Given the performance of the Snapdragon chipset, one may wonder why Samsung continues to use the Exynos chipset in some of their phones. The reason is that Samsung is the manufacturer of the Exynos chipsets, so they save money by using their own parts instead of buying components from another company like Qualcomm. Additionally, Samsung has more flexibility when it comes to selling different variants of their phones in different markets. For example, they can sell a 4G variant of their phone in places like India, where 5G infrastructure is not yet available.
CDMA vs GSM
CDMA and GSM are two different ways of cellular communication. CDMA is used by many carriers in the US and some other countries, while GSM is used by the rest of the world. Chipsets designed for CDMA are typically better suited for the US and other CDMA regions.
Why Doesn’t Samsung Use Exynos in the US?
The question arises as to why Samsung doesn’t just add CDMA functionality to their Exynos chips and use them in the US. There is no one consistent answer to this question, but there are three potential explanations. Firstly, having Qualcomm on board may ease the supply chain stress. Samsung sells millions of flagship phones, so having another company produce parts for them would ease the workload. Secondly, Qualcomm may have patents related to CDMA standards which Samsung would be breaching if they tried to add them to their own chip. , it could be that Samsung and Qualcomm have some sort of agreement or mutual understanding, whereby Samsung keeps their Exynos chips out of the US and in return they get first dibs on Qualcomm’s best chips.
Qualcomm’s Dominance
Qualcomm’s dominance in the US market is undeniable. In 2017, it looked like Samsung bought Qualcomm’s entire first batch of flagship Snapdragon 805 chips, leaving other manufacturers like LG without any. This is an example of Qualcomm’s power in the US market and why Samsung may choose to use their chips instead of their own Exynos.
Exynos vs Snapdragon
The debate between Exynos and Snapdragon is ongoing. Generally speaking, Exynos chips are better suited for international markets, while Snapdragon chips are better suited for the US market. In terms of performance, there is not much difference between the two. However, Snapdragon chips are typically more power efficient, which is why they are preferred in the US.
Snapdragon 820
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is available in two different versions, depending on the region. The US version of the phone is powered by the Snapdragon 820 processor, while the international version is powered by the Exynos processor. While both of these phones are technically the same device, they are quite different in terms of performance. The Snapdragon 820 is a powerful processor, and it is capable of delivering a smooth and responsive experience.
Exynos Processor
The Exynos processor is not as powerful as the Snapdragon 820, but it is still a capable processor. It is capable of delivering a good performance, but it is not as powerful as the Snapdragon 820. The Exynos processor is also more power efficient than the Snapdragon 820, which means that it will consume less battery power. However, it is not as powerful as the Snapdragon 820, and it may not be able to keep up with the more demanding tasks.
Performance Gap
The performance gap between the two versions of the Galaxy S20 Ultra is quite significant. The Snapdragon 820 is significantly more powerful than the Exynos processor, and it is capable of delivering a smoother and more responsive experience. The Exynos processor is not as powerful as the Snapdragon 820, and it may struggle to keep up with more demanding tasks.
Price Difference
The price difference between the two versions of the Galaxy S20 Ultra is also quite significant. The US version of the phone is significantly cheaper than the international version, which is powered by the Exynos processor. This is likely due to the fact that the Snapdragon 820 is a more powerful processor than the Exynos processor, and it is also more power efficient.
Future Prospects
Despite the performance gap between the two versions of the Galaxy S20 Ultra, there is a good chance that the Exynos processor could be patched to bridge the gap. However, Samsung recently announced that they are shutting down their CPU division, and they will likely be buying pre-built CPU cores instead. This could mean that the performance disparity between the two versions of the Galaxy S20 Ultra could be less in the future, but it also means that there is one less company competing in the mobile CPU market.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is available in two versions, one powered by an Exynos chip and the other by a Qualcomm Snapdragon chip. While the two chips may appear similar on the surface, benchmark tests and other tests have revealed a significant disparity between the two. The Snapdragon version is far ahead in terms of speed and power, with a score of 550,000 compared to 500,000 for the Exynos version. It also has an advantage when it comes to battery life, with tests showing that it can last up to 10 hours on a single charge, while the Exynos version can only last up to 8 hours. Thermal throttling is also an issue with the Exynos chip, with tests showing that it can reach temperatures of up to 66 degrees Celsius.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is equipped with two powerful processors, the Exynos 990 and the Snapdragon 865. While both processors offer excellent performance, the Snapdragon 865 offers a smoother and faster camera UI, as well as superior photo quality.
When it comes to the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Exynos and Snapdragon versions have some distinct differences. While the differences may not be immediately obvious, they become more apparent when taking a closer look. In terms of camera performance, the Snapdragon version appears to have an edge over the Exynos, with sharper textures and greater detail. Additionally, the Snapdragon version has better power efficiency, with an estimated screen-on time of nine hours compared to seven hours for the Exynos version.
The comparison between the Exynos and Snapdragon chipsets reveals that the Snapdragon chipset is the superior option in terms of speed and power. However, Samsung continues to use the Exynos chipset in some of their phones due to the cost savings and flexibility it provides.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is available with either an Exynos or Snapdragon processor, depending on the region. Generally speaking, Exynos chips are better suited for international markets, while Snapdragon chips are better suited for the US market. In terms of performance, there is not much difference between the two, but Snapdragon chips are typically more power efficient. Ultimately, the choice between Exynos and Snapdragon comes down to personal preference.